<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Escondido Democratic Club</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.escondidodems.org/wp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.escondidodems.org/wp</link>
	<description>Political news and views for Escondido Democrats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:41:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>General Plan EIR complete; comment period begins</title>
		<link>http://www.escondidodems.org/wp/2012/01/13/general-plan-eir-complete-comment-period-begins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.escondidodems.org/wp/2012/01/13/general-plan-eir-complete-comment-period-begins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Escondido Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.escondidodems.org/wp/?p=9119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 45-day period for public review and comment on the Environmental Impact Report element of the General Plan Update began January 13 and continues through February 27, 2012. A Planning Commission Workshop was held January 24 and a City Council workshop was held February 1. Additional public meetings are anticipated during the spring and summer, after the comment [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.escondidodems.org/wp/2012/01/13/general-plan-eir-complete-comment-period-begins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Charter proposal released</title>
		<link>http://www.escondidodems.org/wp/2012/01/11/new-charter-proposal-released/</link>
		<comments>http://www.escondidodems.org/wp/2012/01/11/new-charter-proposal-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Escondido Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.escondidodems.org/wp/?p=9101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Escondido officials have released a second version of a proposed Charter for the city. The revised version changes the section on &#8220;Fair and Open Competition&#8221; to remove reference to project labor agreements. The section now reads &#8220;The City will promote fair and open competition for all City construction projects so that all contractors and workers, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.escondidodems.org/wp/2012/01/11/new-charter-proposal-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>S. D. County gets more &#8216;blue&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.escondidodems.org/wp/2012/01/08/s-d-county-gets-more-blue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.escondidodems.org/wp/2012/01/08/s-d-county-gets-more-blue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaigns - Local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Escondido Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.escondidodems.org/wp/?p=9079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democratic voter registration efforts have paid off. At the end of 2011 there were nearly 7,000 more Democrats registered in San Diego County than Republicans. That number had increased from a lead of just 332 voters in May, 2011. The registrar of voters reported 519,248 Democrats and 512,270 Republicans registered. In Escondido, there were 24,115 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.escondidodems.org/wp/2012/01/08/s-d-county-gets-more-blue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charter vote delayed to November</title>
		<link>http://www.escondidodems.org/wp/2012/01/06/charter-vote-delayed-to-november/</link>
		<comments>http://www.escondidodems.org/wp/2012/01/06/charter-vote-delayed-to-november/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Escondido Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.escondidodems.org/wp/?p=9060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proponents of a change to Charter City status have acknowledged another failure in their effort to bring the proposal before voters &#8212; they have missed deadlines for public hearings and must move the vote to the November general election. This is a crucial change. It means a broader political range and a higher number of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.escondidodems.org/wp/2012/01/06/charter-vote-delayed-to-november/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abed: Ballpark is dead after court ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.escondidodems.org/wp/2011/12/30/abed-ballpark-is-dead-after-court-ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.escondidodems.org/wp/2011/12/30/abed-ballpark-is-dead-after-court-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 15:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Escondido Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.escondidodems.org/wp/?p=9037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Escondido Mayor Sam Abed is quoted as saying &#8220;the ballpark is dead&#8221; after the California Supreme Court ruled against redevelopment agencies. The ruling eliminates the source of funding Escondido officials had planned to use for a Triple-A ballpark proposed by Padres owner Jeff Moorad. City officials will now proceed with plans to develop land acquired [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.escondidodems.org/wp/2011/12/30/abed-ballpark-is-dead-after-court-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

