Stay informed!

Receive weekly emails from EDC. Your address is kept private.
My Email:  

Read Our Latest Email Update

EDC's weekly emails contain the latest news, action alerts and reminders about upcoming events. Check out the most recent message.

Follow EDC on…


Follow EDC on FaceBook

Follow EDC on Twitter

Visit the EDC YouTube Channel

‘Like’ EDC on Facebook!

See all of EDC's posts on your Facebook page! First, go to your account on Facebook and log in. Then use the search area at the top of the page to search for "Escondido Democratic Club." Once there, cliick the 'Like' button at the top, next to our name. That's all there is to it!

Supremes rule to allow corporate campaigning

It is hard to overstate the implications of the Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. Most observers are predicting that corporations will now have no limits on their ability to inject funds into campaigns, not by contributing them to candidates, but rather by advertising for or against candidates. It should be noted that the ruling also removes restrictions on labor unions.

Click here to read the opinion. (Large PDF, not recommended for slow connections.)

Congressman Barney Frank and others feel there may be a way to legislate some restraints. See his interview with Rachel Maddow after the jump. Also see video from President Obama and read what others say about the ruling…

Rachel Maddow discusses Congressional options with Rep. Barney Frank (D- MA), January 21, 2010:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Statement from President Obama


Commentary

OPINION: Supreme Court ruling calls for a populist revolt
The Washington Post, January 25, 2010

Court unlikely to stop with Citizens United, by Eliza Newlin Carter
Ruling on corporate election spending doesn’t bode well for other campaign regulations
National Journal, January 21, 2010

Day after: SCOTUS ruling not so bad? by Jeanne Cummings
(“It’s time for everybody to calm down,” says one expert observer.)
Politico.com, January 22, 2010

Justices turn minor movie case into a blockbuster by Adam Liptak
The New York Times, January 22, 2010

An intellectually dishonest power grab by Ruth Marcus
Washington Post, January 23, 2010

Campaign finance ruling reflects Supreme Court’s growing audacity
Washington Post, January 22, 2010

Court shows it might be willing to act boldly
Washington Post, January 22, 2010

Lobbyists Get Potent Weapon in Campaign Finance Ruling
The New York Times, January 22, 2010

EDITORIAL: The Court’s Blow to Democracy
The New York Times, January 22, 2010

2 comments to Supremes rule to allow corporate campaigning

  • Charles Cleveland

    It’s time to get going and save our democracy. The Supreme Court’s decision is our biggest wake-up call in living memory.

    It’s easy to dispair in times like this, but the situation is far from hopeless. A people can always take back their country, even from the most brutal dictatorship, although the personal cost for particular individuals can become quite high. To make sure we don’t reach that point, we need to roll up our sleeves and get to work, now!

    For starters, I sent the following message to the Whitehouse Comment Page this morning:

    Mr. President —
    With yesterday’s supreme court decision, the clock began ticking for our very democracy — and time is short. Please take a firm public stand to end corporate personhood.

    Please consider promoting the following proposed Constitutional Amendment,
    together with the strategy which follows to help get it adopted:

    “A corporation is not a person,
    and derives no rights from this Constitution,
    but only from ordinary laws enacted by the Congress
    and signed by the President.”

    To help get this adopted, introduce it together with
    one or more bills in Congress that would provide corporations with most of the rights they currently enjoy — but with the restrictions on political involvement which were in place prior to the Supreme Court Decision. In other words, the status quo would be preserved. Moreover this legislation would take effect only when the Constitutional Amendment proposed above is adopted.

    Coupling the Constitutional Amendment with this legislation
    would immediately change the basis of any corporate rights from the Constitution to ordinary laws enacted by Congress, without disrupting
    any of their legitimate activities. There would be no excuse they
    could put forward for not adopting the Amendment.

    The Congress would then be free to pass additional legislation to regulate corporate activities in any way it deemed appropriate, including additional restrictions on political involvement.

    Again, time is short. As I wrote to you yesterday, this is your moment — please step up to the plate.

  • Joanna Welch

    Thank you soo much for putting these on the web. We don’t have a TV so I did not see these before. Keep up the good work. We need to get active on these events. Move On has an action in Chula Vista on the 26th – we need more local actions!

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*